Obstacles To Effective QA Management Part 4
“I’d say that each place was better than the last but I always felt I didn’t have enough management support and that I didn’t have the same leeway as the programmers, business analysts and such.” Matia admitted to Robyn the Business Improvement and Management consultant.
“I think Quality Assurance professionals often feel over pressured, under supported, and under appreciated,” Robyn noted. “Just think about it. Your job is to spot mistakes and omissions. It’s a positive and needed role but I have yet to encounter an organization whose people truly view it as such. Programmers take it personally. Project sponsors see QA as something that can keep them from coming in within budget and on schedule. Sometimes the QA team reports into the head of Development which poses a clear conflict of interest.
Since most companies don’t have a ‘build quality in from the beginning’ mindset, despite Six Sigma and CMMI, Quality Assurance is seldom treated as a partner that should be brought into the project at inception. Timelines are normally unrealistic and they slip; then formal Quality Assurance testing is the last phase before the project can be shipped out. Most everyone is tired and just wants it to be over.”
-To be Continued
Next Episode: Obstacles To Effective QA Management Part 5
![MP900437251[1]](http://ybsapj.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/mp9004372511.jpg?w=150&h=150)

![MP900437251[1]](http://ybsapj.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/mp9004372511.jpg?w=298&h=300)
![MP900444366[1]](http://ybsapj.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/mp9004443661.jpg?w=300&h=199)
